The following will be published next month in the journal Science Progress http://www.sciencereviews2000.co.uk/view/journal/science-progress, which I am an editor of - so, this is a preview!
1. Introduction.
That synthesis might be undertaken by the direct manipulation of atoms was suggested by Richard Feynman in 1959, although term "nano-technology"1 was not coined until 1974, by Norio Taniguchi. In 1986, K. Eric Drexler published his book Engines of Creation: The Coming Era of Nanotechnology, which contained the notion of a nanoscale "assembler" with the capacity to build copies of itself and other items, by atomic level manipulation. The groundbreaking invention, in 1981, of the scanning tunnelling microscope (STM) demonstrated that individual atoms could be visualised, and the technology was further developed to physically move adsorbed atoms and molecules around on a surface2. Notable examples2 demonstrated for publicity purposes are the sign-writing of "IBM" using 35 xenon atoms on a Ni(110) surface, and of "2000" using 47 CO molecules on a Cu(211) surface, by researchers in the eponymous organisation, to auger in the new millennium. Considerably larger molecules can also be moved using an STM tip, for example 1,4-diiodobenzene and biphenyl, which have been towed around on copper surfaces. The tunnelling electrons may also be used to initiate chemical reactions, the products of which can be subsequently manipulated over the surface, so providing proof of chemical change having occurred, e.g. the conversion of iodobenzene to biphenyl. As a definition, nanotechnology (nanotech) can be described as the manipulation of matter over an atomic, molecular, and supramolecular dimension. Molecular nanotechnology is the intention of manipulating atoms and molecules, so to create macroscale products. The prefix “nano” is derived from the Greek word meaning “dwarf”. The U.S. National Nanotechnology Initiative3 defines nanotechnology as, “the manipulation of matter with at least one dimension in the range 1—100 nanometers (nm)”, where quantum mechanical effects become increasingly important as the smaller end of the range is accessed. It is critical that the particular materials, and devices made from them, should possess properties that are different from the bulk (micrometric or larger) materials, as a consequence of their small size, which may include enhanced mechanical strength, chemical reactivity, electrical conductivity, magnetism and optical effects (e.g. Figure 1).
One nm is one billionth, or 10−9, of a meter, which in relative size to a meter is about the same as that of a marble to the Earth.4 Placed in a different context, an average man's beard grows about one nm in the time it takes him to lift the razor to his face.4 The lower limit is set by the size of atoms, which are the fundamental building blocks of nanotechnology devices, while the upper limit is of a more arbitrary quality but is of the dimension at which the particular phenomena of the quantum realm begin to appear, which are essential to the nano-device. A device that is merely a miniaturised form of an equivalent macroscopic version does not conform to nanotechnology, lacking these particular phenomena, but is classified under the heading microtechnology.5 In regard to the fabrication of nanodevices, we find the "bottom-up" approach, where materials and devices are constructed from molecular components which self-assemble via molecular recognition, while in the "top-down" approach, nano-objects are built from larger entities, not involving control at an atomic level.6
The plural forms "nanotechnologies" and "nanoscale technologies" thus refer to the many and various aspects, devices and their applications that have in common this scale of the quantum realm. Indeed, there are multifarious potential applications of nanoscale materials, including industrial and military uses, as attested by the investment of $3.7 billion, by the U.S. National Nanotechnology Initiative, $1.2 billion by the European Union and $ 750 million in Japan.1 It may be that nanotechnology can provide advances in medicine, electronics, biomaterials, energy production and, as is the subject of this article, in agriculture and more broadly in the food industry. On the other hand, nanotechnology raises many of those same issues as when any new technology is inaugurated, e.g. concerns about the toxicity and environmental impact of nanomaterials,1 and their potential effects on global economics, in addition to speculation over potential doomsday scenarios (“grey goo”), most emphatically dramatised by the late Michel Crighton in his novel Prey7. The Royal Society's report on nanotechnology contains examples of some of the definitions and potential implications of nanotechnologies.8 Commercial products, so far, are limited1 to bulk applications of nanomaterials, rather than atomic scale synthesis, e.g. the use of silver nanoparticles as a bactericide, nanoparticle-based transparent sunscreens, and stain-resistant textiles based on carbon nanotubes.The aspects embraced by nanotechnology are broad, and there is much work and concern over the large-scale employment of engineered nanoparticles (ENMs) and their effects on the environment, agriculture, and plants, and the humans who consume them directly. Moreover, as this short survey attempts to indicate, there is also now a considerable body of work in the applications of nanoscale technology to agriculture and the food industry. Indeed, an ACS Select was recently published on this topic9.Thus may be provided novel sensors intended to improve the quality and safety of food, along with methods of packaging that will amend the storage and delivery of foodstuffs.
According to the researchers and stakeholders, revolutionary advances can be anticipated during the next 10-15 years, principally through a convergence of nanotechnology, biotechnology and agricultural and environmental sciences, of which the following have been listed9:
•development of nanotechnology-based foods with
lower calories and less fat, salt, and sugar while retaining flavour and
texture;
•nanoscale vehicles for effective delivery of
micronutrients and sensitive bioactives;
•re-engineering of crops, animals, and microbes at
the genetic and cellular level;
•nanobiosensors for detection of pathogens, toxins,
and bacteria in foods;
•identification systems for tracking animal and
plant materials from origination to consumption;
•integrated systems for sensing, monitoring, and active
response intervention for plant and animal production;
•smart field systems to detect, locate, report, and
direct application of water;
•precision and controlled release of fertilizers
and pesticides;
•development of plants that exhibit drought resistance
and tolerance to salt and excess moisture; and
•nanoscale films for food packaging and contact
materials that extend shelf life, retain quality, and reduce cooling
requirements.
2.
Nanotechnology in agriculture.
2.1 Precision Farming.
Precision
farming aims to maximise output (i.e. crop yields) while minimising input (i.e.
fertilisers, pesticides, herbicides, water etc). Computers, global satellite
positioning systems, and remote sensing devices are all employed in the
monitoring of highly localised environmental conditions, so to determine
whether crops are growing at maximum efficiency or any specific problems, and
their precise location. The input of fertilizers and water use can be
optimised, resulting in lower production costs and potentially greater
production. The amount of waste from agriculture can also be reduced, further
minimising its environmental impact. Real-time monitoring may be achieved
through linking nanotechnology-enabled sensor devices with a GPS system. By
dispersing nanosensors throughout a field, soil conditions and crop growth
could be continuously monitored. A wi-fi system has been introduced in one of the
Californian vineyards, Pickberry, in Sonoma County , for which the initial cost
is justified since it enables the best grapes to be grown, to produce finer
wines, to be sold at a premium price10.
2.2 Smart Delivery Systems.
Many of
the pesticides that were in widespread use during the second half of the 20th
Century, have been banned on account of their toxicity. As an alternative means
to maintain adequate crop yields, Integrated Pest Management systems have been
introduced, which employ a blend of traditional methods of crop rotation and
biological pest control methods. However, it is thought that nanoscale “smart”
devices might be employed, e.g. to identify plant health dysfunctions before
they have advanced sufficiently to become visible to the farmer, and even to
provide a remedial response to them. Such devices might therefore act both as an
early warning system and as a curative. Chemical agents, such as fertilizers,
pesticides and herbicides, might thus be delivered by targeted and controlled
means, in fact similar to drug-delivery systems in nanomedicine. The deployment
of these agents has been revolutionised through methods of encapsulation and
controlled release, e.g. in formulations containing nanoparticles in the
100—250 nm size range with improved water solubility. (thus increasing their
activity). Alternatively, suspensions of 200—400 nm nanoparticles (nanoemulsions)
- either water or oil-based – may be readily incorporated in a variety of media
(gels, creams, liquids, etc.), with multiple advantages. The Primo MAXX® plant
growth regulator, which if applied before the impacts of heat, drought, disease
or traffic are manifest, has been shown to strengthen the physical structure of
turfgrass, allowing it to cope with such stresses throughout the growing
season.10
Marketed
under the name Karate®ZEON, is a rapid-release microencapsulated product
containing lambda-cyhalothrin (a
synthetic insecticide related to natural pyrethrins) which bursts, to discharge
its contents, on contact with leaves.10 A more targeted agent is the
appositely named “gutbuster”, which releases its active agent from an
capsulated form when it encounters alkaline environments, as pertains in the
stomachs of some insects.10 Smart fertiliser and pesticide delivery
systems are being researched, employing nanoparticles, with the ultimate goal
to release their contents, either slowly or quickly, in response to particular
environmental changes, such as magnetic fields, heat, moisture, etc. Through
such nanodevices, a more efficient use of water, pesticides, herbicides and
fertilizers might be engendered, so to create a more environmentally friendly
and less polluting version of agriculture.
2.4 Other Developments in the Agricultural Sector
due to Nanotechnology.
Nanotechnology
can offer routes to added value crops or environmental remediation, for
example, particle farming may provide nanoparticles by growing plants in
defined soils, to be subsequently employed industrially. As an example, when alfalfa
plants are grown in soil containing gold nanoparticles, the latter are absorbed
via the plant roots and which accumulate in the body of the plant. When the
plants are harvested, the gold nanoparticles can be recovered by mechanical
separation.18 The U.S.-based firm, Argonide, is employing 2 nm diameter
aluminium oxide nanofibres (NanoCeram) in water purifying filters, which can
remove viruses, bacteria and protozoan cysts from water that is contaminated
with them.10 The German chemical group BASF has targeted a
substantial proportion of its $105 million nanotechnology research fund to
water purification techniques. The French utility company Generale des Eaux has
also developed its own Nanofiltration technology in collaboration with the Dow
Chemical subsidiary Filmtec. Ondeo, the water unit of French conglomerate Suez,
has meanwhile installed what it calls an ultrafiltration system, with holes of
0.1 microns in size, in one of its plants outside Paris.10 Altairnano
are using a device termed “Nanocheck” which contains lanthanum nanoparticles
that can absorb phosphates from aqueous environments, e.g. to prevent the
growth of algae in ponds, swimming pools with a future market for commercial
fish ponds, to reduce the currently high costs of removing algae from them.10
Contaminated soil and groundwater may be “cleaned” by the action of iron
nanoparticles, which can catalyse the oxidation of organic pollutants such as
trichloroethene, carbon tetrachloride, dioxins, and PCBs to form simpler and
less toxic carbon compounds. Iron oxide nanoparticles have been shown to be
highly effective in binding and removing arsenic from groundwater, a
significant health problem in West Bengal and Bangladesh, where there are
naturally high concentrations of arsenic present in the soils and groundwater.10
In the U.S., there are of the order of 150,000 underground storage tank egresses,
along with a considerable number of landfills, abandoned mines, and industrial
sites that might be cleaned-up using nanoparticles.10
2.4 Nanoparticles and Recycling Agricultural Waste.
Nanotechnology finds applications11 in agricultural waste prevention, particularly in the cotton industry. Some of the cellulose or the fibres that arise when cotton is processed into fabrics and garments, are either discarded as waste or they may be taken-up into making low-value products such as cotton wool or wadding. However, using an electrospinning method, 100 nm diameter cotton fibres can be produced, which are able to absorb fertilizers or pesticides very effectively, so permitting their later targeted application in agriculture. Cellulosic feedstocks are now regarded as a viable means for producing biofuels, and research is underway to nano-engineer enzymes for the simple and cheap conversion of cellulose from waste plant residues into ethanol. When rice husk is burned to produce thermal energy, a by-product is high-quality nanosilica, which can be processed in the fabrication of glass and concrete, thus converting a troublesome waste product into useful materials.
3. Nanotechnology in the Food Industry.
That the
potential for nanotechnology in the food industry is limited only by human
ingenuity is made clear by the aforementioned recent ACS Select on the subject9.
The widening prospect to design and operate on the nanoscale accords that more
engineered nanomaterials (ENMs) will ultimately find their way onto our farms,
into our supermarkets, onto our plates and into our bodies. There had been some
lack of will to disclose their activities in “nanofood”, but a number of
companies have more lately been explicit in their intentions to introduce the
technology, e.g. in smart packaging, on demand preservatives, and interactive
foods. The latter concept centres around having thousands of nanocapsules
containing flavour or colour enhancers, or added nutritional elements (such as
vitamins), in the food, which would remain dormant until their release and
activation was triggered by the consumer10. Thus, consumers would be
able to modify food, according to their particular nutritional requirements or
preferences. Kraft foods have established a consortium involving 15 different universities
to research into applications of nanotechnology for the creation of interactive
foods. The consortium further intends to develop smart foods, containing nanocapsules
which will be ingested with food, but remain dormant until activated: thus,
nutrients can be released to counter any deficiencies as detected by
nanosensors. To be characterised as nanofood,
it is necessary that nanotechnology methods or materials must feature at in the
creation of the food at some point in its cultivation, production, processing,
or packaging. It does not mean that the foodstuff will be created or modified
at the atomic level, which for the foreseeable future will remain the stuff of
science fiction.
3.1 Packaging and Food Safety.
Food is
packaged in films principally to prevent it from going dry, and to protect it
from external moisture and oxygen. In the future, nanotechnology may provide
smart packaging systems with the ability to mend small holes or tears, react to
changes in particular environmental conditions, such as temperature and
moisture concentration, and signal to the customer when the food has become
contaminated. An “electronic tongue” is being developed for inclusion in
packaging, with an array of nanosensors that are specific for the detection of
gases that accompany the spoiling of food, which cause colour changes in the
sensor strip - an unambiguous signal that the food has “gone off”. The Durethan
KU2-2601 packaging film has been produced by Bayer Polymers, containing silica
nanoparticles, with improved properties of weight, mechanical strength and heat
resistance. The particles provide a highly effective barrier against the
intrusion of oxygen, and the loss of water, so prolonging the life of foodstuffs.
When beer is stored in plastic bottles, a reaction occurs between the
alcohol and the plastic, resulting in a greatly diminished shelf-life, such
that shipping beer in this way is not practical, despite the advantages of
reduced weight over glass bottles, and lower cost. However, a nanocomposite has
been developed, containing clay nanoparticles, called Imperm, from which
bottles can be made. The nanocomposite structure both reduces the loss of CO2
from the beer and keeps oxygen out, extending the shelf-life to around 6 months.10
Antimicrobial films have been produced by Kodak, that can absorb oxygen from
the contents of the package, so lengthening the shelf-life of food. The NanoBioluminescence
Detection Spray contains a luminescent protein which specifically binds to the
surface of microbes, e.g. salmonella and E.
coli. On binding, a visible glow is emitted, providing an instant signature
of bacterial contamination, the degree of which is in proportion to the
intensity of the glow. EU researchers in the Good Food Project have developed a
portable nanosensor that can be used in field situations, e.g. on-farm,
abattoir, during transportation, processing or at the packaging point. Thus,
food can be tested for chemicals, pathogens and toxins there and then, avoiding
the need to send samples away to analytical laboratories10.
The BioFinger
device, developed with funding from the European Union, employs a cantilever,
the tip of the which is coated with specific molecules that can bind to others,
e.g. on the surface of bacteria, whereupon the tip bends and resonates. Since the
cantilevers are incorporated on a disposable microchip, the device is easy to
carry around.10 By means of the “lotus effect” (lotus leaves are
coated with nanoscale wax pyramids which cause water to form beads and run off
them) a dirt-repelling packaging material has been fabricated at the University
of Bonn, intended for use in abattoirs and meat processing plants. The
bactericidal properties of silver nanoparticles are well known12,
and they are used to coat the inside of some washing machines, particularly
those that run at temperatures well below the “boil wash”. However, it has been
shown that magnesium oxide and zinc oxide nanoparticles are highly effective at
destroying microorganisms, which clearly are much cheaper to make, and it is
thought they might revolutionise food packaging materials.10 Radio
Frequency Identification (RFID) technology is used in many areas of the food
industry, e.g. for stock control in retail outlets, and to ensure better
efficiency in the supply chain. The technology, first developed for military
use over half a century ago, employs a tag with microprocessors with an antenna
for the transmission of signals to a wireless receiver: thus, the journey of an
item can be traced from the warehouse to the consumer, giving the advantage
over bar codes, that line-of-sight is not necessary, and many hundreds of
tagged-items can be read per second. A nanofood consortium has been created
which aims to: develop sensors which can
almost instantly reveal whether a food sample contains toxic compounds or
bacteria; to develop anti-bacterial surfaces for machines involved in food
production; to develop thinner, stronger and cheaper wrappings for food; and
the creation of food with a healthier nutritional composition.10 The
Centre for Advanced Food Studies (LMC), which is an alliance of Danish institutions
working in food sciences,
proposed that the food science thematic priority in the Seventh Framework
Programme (FP7) should address six specific areas13:
- basic understanding of food and feed for intelligent innovation;
- systems biology in food research;
- biological renewal in the food sector/biological production;
- technology development;
- nutrigenomics;
- consumer needs-driven innovation and food communication.
It is believed by LMC that a focus on these fields would force an interdisciplinary and holistic approach, adding that possible risks, health, the environment and ethical issues should be incorporated into each of the priority areas. Following a foresight exercise on nanoscience, food researchers in Denmark hold the opinion that they are well placed to participate in international projects. Recommendations for significant increases in funding were made, and seven research areas were prioritised, as a result of the exercise, four of these LMC consider are relevant to food science: biocompatible materials; nanosensors and nanofluidics; plastic electronics; and nanomaterials with new functional properties.
- basic understanding of food and feed for intelligent innovation;
- systems biology in food research;
- biological renewal in the food sector/biological production;
- technology development;
- nutrigenomics;
- consumer needs-driven innovation and food communication.
It is believed by LMC that a focus on these fields would force an interdisciplinary and holistic approach, adding that possible risks, health, the environment and ethical issues should be incorporated into each of the priority areas. Following a foresight exercise on nanoscience, food researchers in Denmark hold the opinion that they are well placed to participate in international projects. Recommendations for significant increases in funding were made, and seven research areas were prioritised, as a result of the exercise, four of these LMC consider are relevant to food science: biocompatible materials; nanosensors and nanofluidics; plastic electronics; and nanomaterials with new functional properties.
3.2 Food Processing
A
critical feature in the area of “on demand” foods is the development of
nanocapsules which are to be included in food to deliver nutrients to cells as
necessary. Nanoparticles may also be added to existing foods so that nutrients
are absorbed more effectively. In Western Australia, a major bakery has
incorporated nanocapsules containing tuna fish oil (a source of omega-3 fatty
acids) into bread: these have the advantage that the capsules only release
their contents when in the stomach, so that the taste of fish oil, which some
people find unpleasant, is avoided10. Nano-sized Self-assembled
Liquid Structures (NSSL) are employed, in the form of ca 30 nm diameter expanded micelles with nutrients or
“nutraceuticals” contained within the aqueous interior, including lycopene,
beta-carotene, lutein, phytosterols, CoQ10 and DHA/EPA. The particles have the
trade-name, Nutralease, and allow the nutraceuticals to enter the bloodstream
from the gut more easily than from normal foodstuffs. NSSL is marketed by
Shemen Industries to deliver Canola Activa oil, which competes for bile
solubilisation, and is claimed to reduce the body’s cholesterol intake by 14%. 50
nm coiled nanoparticles, called nanocochelates, have been developed by Biodelivery
Sciences International, for the enhanced delivery of nutrients such as
vitamins, lycopene, and omega fatty acids, with no influence on the food’s
colour or taste. As a result of the above, the “super foodstuffs” concept is
brought closer to becoming real, with potential manifold benefits, e.g. more
energy, better cognitive functions, improved immune function, and anti-aging
protection. A new product by the name of NanoCeuticals, which is a colloid (or
emulsion) of particles of less than 5 nm in diameter, has been brought out by
Royal BodyCare, who claim that it will scavenge free radicals, increase hydration
and balance the body’s pH. A nanoceramic has been marketed by the Oilfresh
Corporation (U.S.) which, as a result of its large surface area, prevents the
oxidation and agglomeration of fats in deep fat fryers, thus extending the
useful life span of the oil. The amount of oil used in restaurants and fast
food shops is thus reduced by half, and since the oil heats up faster, there is
a further saving in the amount of energy used for cooking.10
NovaSOL
Sustain, developed by Aquanova (Germany), is a technology which incorporates
two separate substances that are active for fat reduction (CoQ10) and satiety
(alpha-lipoic acid) into micelles of ca
30 nm diameter, and is said to provide a novel approach to intelligent weight
management. The NovaSol technology has been further employed to produce a
vitamin E preparation, called SoluE, that does not cloud liquids, and a similar
material containing vitamin C, called SoluC. Since the NovaSOL protects its
contents from stomach acids, it can be used for the introduction of other
dietary supplements.10 The Woodrow Wilson International Center for
Scholars in the US has produced a consumer database of marketed nanotechnology
and has so far identified more than 15 items which have a direct relation to
the food industry14. A lifeycle analysis15 has been made
of nanocellulose, which is increasingly being used in food packaging and
encapsulation applications.
Efforts
have been made to provide a more stable environment from which to deliver
eugenol, which is present in “oil of cloves”, and is a popular preservative in
the food industry, with antibacterial, antifungal and antioxidant properties. Normally,
eugenol (Figure 2) is relatively sensitive to oxygen heat and light, which tend
to degrade it, but when encapsulated as an inclusion complex in cyclodextrin
(Figure 3), it is much more stable16.
4. Potential Environmental Health and Toxicological
Issues.
From the
ACS Select on nanotechnology in food and agriculture9, we may draw
attention to the following subjects. Despite the attractiveness of using QSAR
approaches to the determination of the econanotoxicological effects of ENMs,
the complexity of the real environmental situation, e.g. many different kinds
of organism and of material types, render the relationships difficult to apply
because of a lack of reliable experimental data17. As an
alternative, high-output screening combined with dynamic energy budget models
is proposed18. Irrespective of the origin of the ENMs, i.e. whether
they are deliberately introduced as part of an agricultural strategy, or
present as contaminants, it is critical to know what effects they may have on
the growth of plants. Thus, when wheat shoots were grown in sand that had been
amended with silver nanoparticles, their growth was demonstrated to be stunted
in a dose-dependent manner19. When Arabidopsis
thaliana was exposed to CeO2 nanoparticles at a concentration of
250 parts per million (ppm), a significant increase in plant biomass was found,
but as the concentration was increased to 500-2000 ppm, plant growth was
decreased by up to 85% in a fashion that was dose-dependent20.
Different effects were observed with In2O3 nanoparticles20.
Although the environmental concentrations of ENMs are generally low, there is a
risk that they may bioaccumulate in plants. Thus, it has been demonstrated that
copper oxide nanoparticles will accumulate in maize plants, translocating from
the roots to the shoots, and back again21. To explore the
possibility of tropic transfer (movements of pollutants up the food chain),
soil was inoculated with gold nanoparticles, and indeed, while the latter could
be transferred to earthworms and thence to bullfrogs, the concentrations decreased
by two orders of magnitude in each step22. It was shown that
children may have the highest level of exposure to TiO2
nanoparticles, which are in relatively high concentrations in “candy products”23.
Silica ENMs were found to enter the gut epithelium, after digestion in the
stomach, alerting to a potential problem that requires further investigation24.
Although nanoscale technology shows
much promise in the food industry and in agriculture, its development must be
done sustainably, and it is governments who will contribute substantially to
this development25, mainly through existing regulations. Notwithstanding
that, during the past decade, much effort has gone into the environmental health and
toxicological Issues of ENMs, considerable uncertainly still remains, for which
the following topics may be highlighted9:
•measurement and
metrology of ENMs in complex matrixes;
•environmental fates and transformation of
currently known ENMs and ever increasing number of newENMs;
•nanobio interface between ENMs with human body and
ecosystem species;
•exposure and full life cycle assessment;
•risk assessment and management of diverse uses of ENMs;
•safety by design; and
•sustainable nanomaterials and nanomanufacturing.
Nanoinformatics
is an emerging field of research, for the design, data integration and
communication of information regarding ENMs. Methods to predict the
econanotoxicology of ENMs need major development and it appears probable that
high-throughput, high-content screening methods will prove useful in assessing
the safety of nanomaterials. I note a much cited review of the environmental
and health effects of nanoparticles, of both natural and artificial origin26.
References.
(1)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_nanotechnology
(2) CJ Rhodes (2005) Reactive radicals on reactive surfaces: Heterogeneous
processes in catalysis and environmental pollution control. Prog. React. Kin. Mech.
30(3), 145-213.
(3) http://www.nano.gov/
(4) Kahn,
J. (2006) Nanotechnology. National Geographic (June): 98–119.
(5) Prasad, S. K.
(2008). Modern Concepts in Nanotechnology. Discovery Publishing House.
pp. 31–32. ISBN 81-8356-296-5.
(6) Rodgers, P. (2006)
Nanoelectronics: Single file. Nature Nanotechnology.
doi:10.1038/nnano.2006.5.
(7) Crichton, M.
(2006) Prey. Harper Collins, New
York. ISBN-13: 978-0007796427.
(8) http://royalsociety.org/policy/publications/2004/nanoscience-nanotechnologies/
(9) Chen, H., Seiber,
J.N. and Hotze, M. (2014) ACS Select on Nanotechnology in Food and Agrculture:
A Perspective on Implications and Applications. J. Agricul. and Food Chem. 62,
1209-1212.
(10) Joseph, T. and
Morrison, M. (2006) Nanotechnology in Agriculture and Food. Nanoforum Report. ftp://ftp.cordis.europa.eu/pub/nanotechnology/docs/nanotechnology_in_agriculture_and_food.pdf
(11) http://www.isaaa.org/resources/publications/pocketk/39/
(12) Lara, H.H. et al. (2011) Silver nanoparticles are broad-spectrum bactericidal
and virucidal compounds. J. Nanobiotech. 9, 30. http://www.jnanobiotechnology.com/content/9/1/30
(13) http://cordis.europa.eu/news/rcn/24345_en.html
(14) http://www.nanotechproject.org/cpi/
(15) Li, Q., et al. (2013) Nanocellulose life cycle assessment. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 1, 919−928.
(16) Kayaci, F., Ertas, Y.and Uyar, T. (2013) Enhanced thermal stability of
eugenol by cyclodextrin inclusion complex encapsulated in electrospun polymeric
nanofibers. J. Agric. Food Chem. 61, 8156−8165.
(17) Kahru, A. and Ivask, A. (2012) Mapping the
dawn of nanoecotoxicological research. Acc.
Chem. Res., 46, 823−833.
(18)
Holden, P. A. et al. (2012) Ecological nano-toxicology: integrating
nanomaterial hazard considerations across the subcellular, population,
community, and ecosystems levels. Acc.
Chem. Res. 46, 813−822
(19) Dimkpa, C. O. et al. (2012) Silver nanoparticles disrupt wheat (Triticum aestivum
L.) growth in a sand matrix.Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 47, 1082−1090.
(20) Ma, C.et al. (2013) Physiological and
molecular response of Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) to nanoparticle cerium and
indium oxide exposure. ACS Sustainable
Chem. Eng.
1, 768−778.
(21) Wang, Z. et
al. (2012) Xylem- and phloem-based transport of CuO nanoparticles in maize (Zea
mays L.). Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 4434−4441.
(22)
Unrine, J. M. et al. (2012) Trophic
transfer of Au nanoparticles from soil along a simulated terrestrial food
chain. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 9753−9760.
(23)
Weir, A. et al. (2012) Titanium
dioxide nanoparticles in food and personal care
products.
Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 2242−2250.
(24)
Peters, R. et al. (2012) Presence of nano-sized
silica during in vitro digestion of foods containing silica as a food additive.
ACS Nano. 6, 2441−2451.
(25)
Bergeson, L. L. (2013) Sustainable nanomaterials: emerging governance systems. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. 1, 724−730.
(26) Buzea, C. et
al. (2007) Nanomaterials and
nanoparticles: Sources and toxicity. Biointerphases 2(4), MR17-MR172. http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0801/0801.3280.pdf
(27) Rhodes, C.J. (2010) Solar Energy -
Principles and Possibilities. Sci. Prog.
93, 37-112.
Captions
to figures:
Figure 1. A
photograph and representative spectrum of photoluminescence from colloidal CdSe
quantum dots excited by UV light. The absorption and consequent fluorescence,
moves to higher energies and hence toward the blue end of the visible spectrum,
as the particle size decreases27. http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/57/CdSeqdots.jpg
Credit: NASA.
Figure
2. Molecular
structure of eugenol http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/86/Eugenol2.svg
Figure
3.
Space filling model of β-cyclodextrin. http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/92/Beta-cyclodextrin3D.png